Top

The Difference Between Negativity and Critical Thinking

December 19, 2006

There’s been a lot of talk in the blogosphere recently about the possibility that we’re all just a bunch of complainers. They say that blogworld is an overwhelmingly negative place. We ought to try to be more optimistic and less cynical, they say. I couldn’t disagree more.

Does this highly democratic medium lend itself to unfettered self-expression? Absolutely. Is unfettered self-expression sometimes less than perky? Most definitely. Is it realistic? On the whole, yes.

Here’s a factoid for you. People diagnosed with clinical depression tend to correctly estimate the amount of control they have over external situations, while people who are not depressed tend to overestimate their level of control over those same situations. In other words, our society calls realism unhealthy while holding up delusional positive thinking as a model of health and functionality. How sane is that?

Now, there’s nothing wrong with enthusiasm, optimism, passion or any of the thousands of other things that make a blog truly readable–and life truly livable–day after day. But there’s also nothing wrong with thinking critically and being skeptical about the world. There’s nothing wrong with seeing hypocrisy in a public figure and pointing it out. If we don’t acknowledge problems, what hope have we of solving them to any real degree?

This mush about negativity is the same complaint that we used to hear about the mainstream media. “Doom and gloom sells newspapers,” they said, “so the media paints an inaccurately grim picture of our world.” But if that were true, then bloggers–who do not have the same economic compulsion to fixate on the distasteful–would not be as “negative” as the media.

We write about what we see. And what we see troubles us. After all, we’ve had an incompetent president and a do-nothing Congress for the past six years. North Korea has the bomb and Iran is pursuing it. Microsoft is releasing a new version of Office that is incompatible with previous versions. There is a genocide going on in the Sudan. Dell has bad customer support. Let me see you put a positive spin on any of that and still do right by your readers.

That’s not to say that the world is all doom and gloom. There’s beauty and joy to leaven the complexity and bitterness of this life. But we need to take off the rose-colored glasses and press on. Knowing where things really stand inspires us to work for a better future. A healthy dose of skepticism and self-doubt enhances our efforts because we don’t automatically assume that everything will go as we plan. We must remain skeptical of solutions–be they political, spiritual, social or economic–that seem too good to be true. It’s called critical thinking, and it’s time that we started using it again.

Comments

4 Responses to “The Difference Between Negativity and Critical Thinking”

  1. breakingranks on December 19th, 2006 11:41 am

    Thanks for this - I absolutely agree that a lot of what is being called “negativity” is critical thinking (especially perceived as “negative” when the speaker is someone who hasn’t been heard before because they don’t have a voice in the offline world).

    Also, if you happen to remember where you read about the ability of depressed people to accurately estimate their control over external situations, please let me know. I can already think of half-a-dozen people I’d like to send that to!

  2. Teresa on December 19th, 2006 12:00 pm

    Eliza: Among others, this finding has been reported by:

    S. Golin et. al., “The Illusion of Control Among Depressed Patients,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 88: 454-57 (1979).

    L.B. Alloy and L.Y. Abramson, “Judgment of Contingency in Depressed and Nondepressed Students: Sadder but Wiser?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108: 441-85 (1979).

    For a contradictory view, see D. Dunning and A.L. Story, “Depression, Realism and the Overconfidence Effect: Are the Sadder Wiser When Predicting Future Actions and Events?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 521-32 (1991); and R.M. Msetfi et. al., “Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments” The Effect of Context and Intertrial Interval,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134: 10-22 (2005).

    I took these citations from the bibliography of Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Gilbert.

  3. breakingranks on December 19th, 2006 12:04 pm

    I estimate a trip to the university library this weekend! :D

  4. Teresa on December 19th, 2006 12:13 pm

    Enjoy :razz:

Got something to say?





Bottom